Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Changing the sponsors page

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Changing the sponsors page
Date: 2011-05-13 07:58:05
Message-ID: BANLkTi=HVX+YxN6qFtu6jjgg8R_TyY0e7w@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
>>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
>>
>> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and just
>> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of getting
>> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
>
> Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
> my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
> sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
> for over three years now.

Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
then you know what my memory is like.



-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-05-13 08:02:06
Subject: Re: Changing the sponsors page
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-05-13 06:52:20
Subject: Re: Crediting sponsors in release notes?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group