On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
>>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
>> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and just
>> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of getting
>> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
> Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
> my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
> sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
> for over three years now.
Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
then you know what my memory is like.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2011-05-13 08:02:06|
|Subject: Re: Changing the sponsors page|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2011-05-13 06:52:20|
|Subject: Re: Crediting sponsors in release notes?|