Re: Changing the sponsors page

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Changing the sponsors page
Date: 2011-05-13 08:45:17
Message-ID: BANLkTi=y41Yu7irbWCfGJh19Ak00Exr3sQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On May 13, 2011 9:58 AM, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:
> >> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
> >>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
> >>
> >> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and
just
> >> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of
getting
> >> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
> >
> > Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
> > my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
> > sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
> > for over three years now.
>
> Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
> then you know what my memory is like.

Pretty sure I've mentioned it to you. But the "formal asking" was to at
least one, but I think both, the Josh:es.

/Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-05-13 13:05:02 Re: Crediting sponsors in release notes?
Previous Message PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2011-05-13 08:20:37 Re: Changing the sponsors page