Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Branch 1.14?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Date: 2011-06-15 10:03:05
Message-ID: BANLkTi=CuW-LpymZmK+u8ZcyRMwcBS_beQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:57, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> We don't have both. We currently have a pgAdmin which supports
>> everything back to 7.3.
>
> No we don't. We have a pgAdmin, which it says on the website supports
> back to 7.3. I know I haven't run anything older than 8.0 for *years*,
> and certainly the QA guys at EDB don't. I don't believe Erwin does
> either. Therefore I don't believe we can honestly say we support back
> to 7.3.

Didn't we at some point say it's reasonable to support as far back as
the pg community support postgresql, which would mean 8.2 at this
point?

As long as we keep the downloads for the older versions around, people
who are running an unsupported version of postgresql should be ok
running an unsupported version of pgadmin,no?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-06-15 10:11:19
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-06-15 09:57:04
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group