Re: You could be a PostgreSQL Patch Reviewer!

From: Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: You could be a PostgreSQL Patch Reviewer!
Date: 2011-06-16 05:39:19
Message-ID: BANLkTi=sN7RkTU_iTif2+NVjZ+XR-snOWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> writes:
>> Wouldn't it be faster/better/easier if Postgres just had its own built
>> in UUID generator?
>
> Why would it be?  If you think you can easily improve on uuid-ossp,
> you should go help them.

I have no knowledge on the subject one way or the other, that's why
I'm asking.. If the answer is "no, there would be no benefit" then
that's the answer.. However, it seems like generating UUIDs in Win64
has been broken, perhaps, forever which is why I question if there's a
better library to use on the Windows platform (or having a single UUID
generator built in for all platforms)..

I'd love to help out with Postgres (and several other open source
projects), perhaps some day though I'm more of a web/.NET guy..

Mike

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-06-16 06:36:40 Re: Constraint to ensure value does NOT exist in another table?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-16 05:34:58 Re: You could be a PostgreSQL Patch Reviewer!