Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Date: 2011-06-03 16:40:41
Message-ID: BANLkTi=ncOyyzyH8BgX9VssM4g9dEDGn-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> That's an improvement of about ~3.5x.
>
> Outstanding!
>
> I don't want to even peek at this until I've posted the two WIP SSI
> patches (now both listed on the "Open Items" page), but will
> definitely take a look after that.

Yeah, those SSI items are important to get nailed down RSN. But
thanks for your interest in this patch. :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-03 16:44:45 Re: BUG #6041: Unlogged table was created bad in slave node
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2011-06-03 16:32:26 Re: Domains versus polymorphic functions, redux