Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Date: 2011-06-06 23:43:30
Message-ID: BANLkTi=YB+uw5YjEryXky3HXmYmzpE+fAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 03 09:17:08 -0400 2011:
>> I've now spent enough time working on this issue now to be convinced
>> that the approach has merit, if we can work out the kinks.  I'll start
>> with some performance numbers.
>
> I hereby recommend that people with patches such as this one while on
> the last weeks till release should refrain from posting them until the
> release has actually taken place.

%(at)#!

Next time I'll be sure to only post my patches during beta if they suck.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2011-06-07 00:55:24 Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-06 23:35:37 Re: contrib/citext versus collations