Re: currval = currval+1

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: salah jubeh <s_jubeh(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: currval = currval+1
Date: 2011-06-01 15:43:42
Message-ID: BANLkTi=FRg-sWLzLnKJH2eR=vD8hk4L64w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:22 AM, salah jubeh <s_jubeh(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> I have some rules on the table and I have dropped them and everything went
> fine. the rule is as follow
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE RULE status_change_ins AS
>     ON INSERT TO account  DO  INSERT INTO account_status_change_log
> (account_id, account_status_id, status_change_date)
>   VALUES (new.account_id, new.account_status_id, now());
>
> I do not know what is happing here, but this is a strange behavior.

'rules suck' is the problem :(. uncontrollable re-execution of
volatile functions is just *one* issue with them. good news: 9.1
completely fixes this with view update triggers. In the meantime,
consider dropping the update rule and making a functions which does
the delete and updates the log, or doing it in the client.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-01 15:52:41 Re: currval = currval+1
Previous Message salah jubeh 2011-06-01 15:22:31 Re: currval = currval+1