Re: eviscerating the parser

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: eviscerating the parser
Date: 2011-05-29 00:28:45
Message-ID: BANLkTi=BwkFngspV-0sNB_8SfmchhmLd6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But by both methods, the majority of the extra time that can be
> accounted for is going to the planner.

Sounds like an argument for a plan cache.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-05-29 01:31:06 Re: How can I check the treatment of bug fixes?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-05-28 21:58:48 Re: storing TZ along timestamps