From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Date: | 2011-06-12 21:08:05 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=9ozcMwuZFARp3mWOOGi27PtOQbw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 27 September 2010 15:29, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 18 July 2010 11:58, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, I just edited an existing dia file: pgclient_server.dia. All I
>>> did was change the font size of the text "client application" at the
>>> top of the diagram, and changed the properties of a line so the
>>> arrowhead was no longer on the end. I used dia 0.97.1 to edit the
>>> file. The result when saving is attached in the diff file. That's a
>>> lot of file changes for what I did.
>>>
>>> Thom
>>>
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> The only explanation I can find to this is that I used dia.0.96.1 to
>> generate the file and you have used 0.97.1 to edit it.
>>
>> Almost all changes are to the attributes:
>> <dia:rectangle val=....
>> <dia:point val=....
>>
>> I suspect that these changes have been done because 'something' have
>> changed between the two main versions in the way they deal with these
>> attributes :(
>
> Has anyone yet come up with a reliable and sensible format we can use?
Obviously nothing for this happened in time to make it for 9.1. So
are diagrams still something we plan to have?
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-12 21:44:23 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-10 00:42:10 | Re: CIDR address in pg_hba.conf |