From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Steve Singer <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JDBC connections to 9.1 |
Date: | 2011-04-18 15:10:22 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=0phhjdrXdu6Wb9LkCZw8D7ujiqA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
>> If i am reading it correct, it reads "UTF8" from the backend, while
>> expecting "UNICODE" only. Not sure what change has caused this,
>> though.
>
> I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago,
> I changed the client_encoding code so that it shows the normalized
> (official) name of the encoding, not whatever random string the client
> sent over. For instance, previous versions:
>
> regression=# set client_encoding = 'UnIcOdE';
> SET
> regression=# show client_encoding ;
> client_encoding
> -----------------
> UnIcOdE
> (1 row)
>
> versus HEAD:
>
> regression=# set client_encoding = 'UnIcOdE';
> SET
> regression=# show client_encoding ;
> client_encoding
> -----------------
> UTF8
> (1 row)
>
> I wasn't aware that JDBC would fail on that. It's pretty annoying that
> it does, but maybe we should grin and bear it, ie revert the change to
> canonicalize the GUC's value?
Ouch. I hate to revert that, since it seems like a clear improvement.
But I also hate to break JDBC. Ouch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2011-04-18 15:11:26 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-18 15:09:20 | Re: Typed table DDL loose ends |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2011-04-18 15:11:26 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-18 14:57:07 | Re: JDBC connections to 9.1 |