Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-11 15:36:31
Message-ID: B6C06742-0E84-424E-9474-1BFD78A98295@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> How about no operator at all? It won't be as cool to read, but
>> consider, the arguments are text and text, not involving any hstore type
>> at all, so whatever operator you choose is in practice blocked from
>> everyone everywhere. No one could ever implement another key/value
>> system that uses a similar interface. Or use the operator for anything
>> else involving strings.
>
> Yeah, that's a good point. Maybe we should just deprecate the operator
> altogether.

That would make it so that the use of => in hstore strings would be less consistent. Makes sense to me.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Reeve 2010-06-11 16:34:30 Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-11 15:23:10 Re: LLVM / clang