Re: [DOCS] Replication documentation addition

From: Casey Duncan <casey(at)pandora(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-documentation" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-10-25 16:49:31
Message-ID: B29B63CC-F8EA-4363-947B-CF671A5FDE03@pandora.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Totally agree. The docs will tend to outlive whatever projects or
websites they mention. Best to not bake that into stone.

-Casey

On Oct 25, 2006, at 3:36 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

>> I don't think the PostgreSQL documentation should be
>> mentioning commercial solutions.
>
> I think maybe the PostgreSQL documentation should be careful about
> trying to list a "complete list" of commercial *or* free solutions.
> Instead linking to something on the main website or on techdocs
> that can
> more easily be updated.
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Klyukin 2006-10-25 18:33:43 Re: Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-25 16:28:34 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-25 17:14:56 Nasty btree deletion bug
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-25 16:28:34 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition