Re: SELECT constant; takes 15x longer on 9.0?

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SELECT constant; takes 15x longer on 9.0?
Date: 2010-04-06 16:09:07
Message-ID: AF37A0A8-BC5F-486C-A10D-D42921F375D8@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Apr 6, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:

>> In our test, which does 5801 of these pings during the test, they take
>> an average of 15x longer to execute on 9.0 as 8.4 ( 0.77ms vs. 0.05ms ).
>
> did your pings change?

No.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-04-06 16:45:49 Re: walreceiver is uninterruptible on win32
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-04-06 16:08:44 Re: SELECT constant; takes 15x longer on 9.0?