Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX

Hi

I think perhaps you can even get metrowerks into donating one, I have not
looked into your project makefiles etc , so I don't know what is needed
apart from wx itself, since this will need some work to make everything
compile properly using a CodeWarrior Project file.

Best,

Stefan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk]
> Sent: Montag, 15. September 2003 08:11
> To: Adam H.Pendleton; Stefan Csomor
> Cc: jm(at)poure(dot)com; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam H.Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> > Sent: 14 September 2003 22:24
> > To: Stefan Csomor
> > Cc: jm(at)poure(dot)com; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
> >
> >
>
> > What is needed to get wxMac to support Apple's Unicode on 10.2? Is
> > there anything I can do to help? I've got the time, but I
> don't know
> > the particulars about what would need to be done.
> >
> > I don't think that supporting 10.3 only is a good idea, only because
> > 10.3 is still in beta, and would be just a useful as
> producing no Mac
> > port at all. OTOH, I can take a look at getting a
> Metrowerks compiler
> > to produce binary snapshots.
> >
> > Dave, what do you think?
>
> Hmm, tricky one. To be honest I thin we need to try and
> target 10.2 as that's what most ppl will have, possibly for
> some time if Apple make it a chargable upgrade. Whats the
> cost implications of getting the Metrowerks tools? (Not that
> we have any sort of budget for the project!)
>
> Regards, Dave
>