| From: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
| Date: | 2008-09-03 18:36:19 |
| Message-ID: | ACDD8907-29A6-4F28-B33C-3F756EB1607F@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sure if people want to do it the right way more power to them. What
you're talking about is punishing people when they don't live up to
your standards.
greg
On 3 Sep 2008, at 16:20, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> I don't think worrying about the message we send to users is
>> reasonable. We can take responsibilty for the messages we output
>> but punishing our users to teach them a lesson is being actively
>> user-hostile
>
> There is no arguing that MB != Mb; nor is there anything user-
> hostile behind the idea of doing it the right way.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-03 18:45:41 | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-09-03 18:31:55 | Testers: 8.4 snapshot RPMs are available |