| From: | Raimon Fernandez <coder(at)montx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Extended Query, flush or sync ? |
| Date: | 2009-12-18 21:44:10 |
| Message-ID: | AC4D2602-8300-41E5-BF48-67C39CD95BBF@montx.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces |
Hello,
It's not clear for me if I have to issue a flush or sync after each process of an extended query.
It's almost working for me only when I send a sync, but not when I send a flush. With the flush, the connection seems freezed, or at least, I don't get any data from postgre.
- Send the parse command
- sync
- Receive the ParseComplete
-sync
- Send the Bind
- sync
- Receive the BincComplete
- send the Execute
- receive an error => "portal xxxxxxx does not exist"
thanks,
regards,
r.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rory Campbell-Lange | 2009-12-18 21:48:03 | Re: Extracting SQL from logs in a usable format |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-12-18 21:28:58 | Re: [GENERAL] Installing PL/pgSQL by default |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-18 21:55:08 | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |
| Previous Message | Raimon Fernandez | 2009-12-18 09:16:27 | Re: Extended Query using the Frontend/Backend Protocol 3.0 |