Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.

From: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
Date: 2010-09-26 19:45:28
Message-ID: AANLkTinzqN5CmEB6CV1sbTYXBQfEy6A7vZwNFb_yiV32@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> We could perhaps fix that if there were an inexpensive way to get the
> SHA1 of the master commit that each branch is sprouted from. However,
> I'm inclined to propose that we instead manually place a tag at each
> sprout point. Any thoughts about that? In particular, what should
> the naming convention for such tags be? I would have liked to use
> RELx_y, but that's out because before 8.0 we named the initial
> releases that way.
>
>
SPLITx_y, STAMPx_y, BRANCHx_y

--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com

singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-26 20:38:23 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-26 19:27:41 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-26 19:45:32 Re: do we want to gitignore regression-test-failure files?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-26 19:27:41 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.