On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I noticed in postgres you cannot return multiple result sets from a
>> stored procedure (surprisingly as it looks like a very good dbms).
>
> That feature has been on the TODO list for years.  However, nobody has
> stepped forward to either write it, or to fund working on it.  If your
> company has programmers or money to build this feature, it could
> probably get done fairly quickly (as in, next version).

Also as mentioned upthread there are effective workarounds if you poke
around a bit.  This is a FAQ, and there are about 3-4 solid methods
(if you search the archives) that cover most problems you would be
looking at multiple results sets to solve.  I suppose this is why
there hasn't been more of an effort to do this earlier.  People asking
for this are typically dispossessed SQL server developers who haven't
quite gotten used to the postgres way of things. Not that proper
stored procedures wouldn't be great -- they would be -- but they are
not the only way to solve these types of problems.

merlin

In response to

• Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure at 2010-09-03 20:07:03 from Josh Berkus

Responses

• Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure at 2010-09-04 14:10:14 from Pavel Stehule

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Greg Stark	Date: 2010-09-04 13:42:40
	Subject: Re: Streaming a base backup from master
Previous:	From: Max Bowsher	Date: 2010-09-04 13:17:40
	Subject: Re: git: uh-oh