Re: git: uh-oh

From: Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-09-04 13:17:40
Message-ID: 4C8246F4.9070206@f2s.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/09/10 12:24, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com> wrote:
>> and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-)
>
> Hey, that's great. But I wonder why Magnus got a different result.

This is the first time I've posted these incantations for excising the
unwanted history, so he would not have been using them.

> Can you post the repo you ended up with somewhere?

Well, it's a Bazaar repository at the moment :-)

But, I'll re-run it targetting git, and push it somewhere. github?
anywhere better?

I think we should start a git repository somewhere containing the
precise conversion recipe - i.e.:

* cvs2git options file
* cvs2git invocation command line
* all scripts that massage the CVS repository before conversion, or the
Git repository afterwards

Max.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-09-04 13:39:16 Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-04 11:24:14 Re: git: uh-oh