| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |
| Date: | 2010-05-19 15:11:31 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinsjD4JQaVrO8qE0YuRYEUbChTjU-CQJBWo80Sj@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>>> given how much faster the new format is (or rather how slow the old one
>>>> was) and the number of people I have seen complaining "why is bytea so
>>>> slow) I would like to see it staying turned on by default. However this
>>>> also depends on how quickly database driver developers can adapt.
>>
>> DBD::Pg is already patched, and will very likely be released before 9.0
>
> How do the distros generaly deal with that? E.g. do we have to wait
> for RHEL7 for it to actually show up in redhat?
Yeah, that's what I'm worried about. I remember going through this
with E'' quoting. It wasn't fun.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-05-19 15:16:42 | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-05-19 15:07:59 | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |