| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: C++ keyword in utils/rbtree.h |
| Date: | 2010-05-11 18:14:46 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinpisq5rNXqU_V-EO8rep_oUsLuXE--9NfOlbja@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck says:
>
> ./utils/rbtree.h:21: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘new’
>
> Can we rename the "new" to something like "new_whateveritis"? And what
> is it? :-)
It's a new value of some kind to be logically "appended" to a list of
existing values. Details depend on the type of data the caller is
storing in the rbtree. Trivial fix committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2010-05-11 18:57:50 | Re: SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2010-05-11 18:05:59 | Re: SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) |