From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Fix selection of objects in backup/restore dialogs |
Date: | 2011-03-14 21:17:56 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinnbiAhSVxu7w95vZdrgidDw2-USk+pnFCKJxwZ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On 12 March 2011 09:27, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Fix selection of objects in backup/restore dialogs
>
> When a user selects a table, the schema and the database should be selected as
> well. This patch handles this automatically.
>
> Report from Melvin Davidson.
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL-1_12_0_PATCHES
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=cbf2e0765ebf18da6256852bf53021d26287630a
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> CHANGELOG | 2 ++
> pgadmin/ctl/ctlCheckTreeView.cpp | 15 ++++++++++++---
> pgadmin/include/ctl/ctlCheckTreeView.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Sorry for the following bit of noise, but...
Is there any need for this line?:
if (newimage == 0 || newimage == 1)
newimage is initialised as 0, and can only otherwise be set to 1, so
I'm not sure where this logic comes in.
Also, I'm not clear as to why if, when newimage = 1, the parent image
is seemingly set twice. I'm referring to the function being called
suggesting both the parent and child image is being set, followed by
the parent image. Shouldn't there at least be an "else if" in there,
or is one of them misnamed?
Cheers
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-03-14 22:02:49 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Fix selection of objects in backup/restore dialogs |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-03-14 20:46:43 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: [pgadmin-hackers] error: expected initializer before ‘!’ token |