From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Date: | 2011-02-14 13:33:05 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinjXpWm_SF_JyuCQC2fn4hFQkGAmPysNjyOdFkk@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I'll be happy if you do, but why haven't I haven't noticed, say, RedHat
>> taking this line?
>
> Less narrow-minded interpretation of GPL requirements, perhaps.
> (And yes, we have real lawyers on staff considering these issues.)
FYI, seems Fedora has been actively trying to move away from OpenSSL
for some time now:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationEval
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
Main arguments are FIPS and single-cert-store, but in the evaluation
of NSS vs. OpenSSL I think license issues have at least some impact.
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-02-14 13:45:35 | why two dashes in extension load files |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-02-14 13:27:30 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |