Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: git: uh-oh

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-08-30 03:03:50
Message-ID: AANLkTini+OcZLEZEj6muHCRrnLuRNYKpsVLKkG4e8nk8@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> The fact that the file was "modified" twice after being removed at rev
>>> 2.88 seems really wacko.  Are you sure that's not contributing to what
>>> we're seeing here?
>>
>> Yeah, that was discussed in the earlier git-conversion thread that I
>> pointed to.  We never did figure out how that happened, though I
>> speculated it might have been due to weirdness in Vadim's local
>> checkout.
>>
>> Is it possible to just delete those two revisions from the CVS
>> repository, and if so would it help?  We certainly don't need 'em.
>
> cvs admin -o ?

Magnus, is this something that you can try?  Prune those could of
wonky revisions after the delete and before the re-add prior to
running the conversion, and see how that comes out?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-08-30 03:14:10
Subject: Re: upcoming wraps
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-08-30 03:02:50
Subject: upcoming wraps

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group