From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: git: uh-oh |
Date: | 2010-08-30 03:03:50 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTini+OcZLEZEj6muHCRrnLuRNYKpsVLKkG4e8nk8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> The fact that the file was "modified" twice after being removed at rev
>>> 2.88 seems really wacko. Are you sure that's not contributing to what
>>> we're seeing here?
>>
>> Yeah, that was discussed in the earlier git-conversion thread that I
>> pointed to. We never did figure out how that happened, though I
>> speculated it might have been due to weirdness in Vadim's local
>> checkout.
>>
>> Is it possible to just delete those two revisions from the CVS
>> repository, and if so would it help? We certainly don't need 'em.
>
> cvs admin -o ?
Magnus, is this something that you can try? Prune those could of
wonky revisions after the delete and before the re-add prior to
running the conversion, and see how that comes out?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-30 03:14:10 | Re: upcoming wraps |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-30 03:02:50 | upcoming wraps |