From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Date: | 2010-07-18 09:56:57 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinf4NneIgL4MhiWh_s-M4jTQlyncdN06vi3a60W@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 18 July 2010 09:36, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On sön, 2010-07-18 at 00:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Well, if we want _any_ images for the 9.0 docs, we had better decide
>> soon.
>
> I'd be very much against putting any images into 9.0 at this time. I
> was working under the assumption that this discussion would be targeting
> 9.1.
>
>
+1
Considering that these will have to become a permanent fixture, I
don't expect this to be decided and working in time for 9.0. I
assumed this was for 9.1 too.
There are too many unresolved concerns, and one I think is important
is whichever format is selected, can small changes be made to a
diagram using an editor without massive changes to the file. Like Tom
said, we might have some editors which will behave and just alter a
piece of text we asked to be changed, and others decide it needs extra
markup and rearrange the order in which things are drawn etc. And
should there be a whitelist of editors known to behave which people
are to use?
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rafael Martinez | 2010-07-18 10:05:26 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-07-18 08:36:55 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |