Re: failover vs. read only queries

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: failover vs. read only queries
Date: 2010-06-09 09:31:18
Message-ID: AANLkTinf1CDtQrhaJPq5uMYccplE775p31fSy1MM59r2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> To fix the problem, when the trigger file is found, I think
> that we should cancel all the running read only queries
> immediately (or forcibly use -1 as the max_standby_delay
> since that point) and make the recovery go ahead.

Oops! I made an error. I meant 0 instead of -1, as the max_standby_delay.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-06-09 09:49:19 Re: failover vs. read only queries
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-06-09 09:13:13 Re: failover vs. read only queries