From: | Ulas Albayrak <ulas(dot)albayrak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Moving a live production database to different server and postgres release |
Date: | 2010-06-14 13:33:23 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinaFEozIluilBnetP9I9yOJIEDcLylv5Yl7bRJN@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
OK,
I see. Does this mean I need to install Slony-I 1.x on both systems or
is different versions of Slony-I, say a 2.x and a 1.x, compatible? The
reason I'm asking is because the new server db will be part of a
permanent postgres replication system in the future and installing a
newer verision of Slony-I would spare me some future work.
/Regards
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
> On 14/06/2010 14:09, Ulas Albayrak wrote:
>
>> After your post I had a look at Slony-I, which, according to it web
>> page, requires postgres 8.3 or later, so I guess that won't work. That
>> leaves Bucardo: will it work on a Windows system?
>
> AIUI, the Slony-I 2.x branch requires PG 8.3+, but the 1.x branch ill
> work perfectly fine on 8.2 and lower.
>
> This is because 1.x messes with the system catalogues and strange ways,
> whereas changes in PG 8.3 made this unnecessary.
>
> HTH,
>
> Ray.
>
>
> --
> Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland
> rod(at)iol(dot)ie
>
--
Ulas Albayrak
ulas(dot)albayrak(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2010-06-14 14:38:51 | Re: Re: Moving a live production database to different server and postgres release |
Previous Message | John Gage | 2010-06-14 13:29:01 | Re: Hosting without pgcrypto functions. There are other solutions? |