Re: Indent authentication overloading

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indent authentication overloading
Date: 2010-11-17 17:14:25
Message-ID: AANLkTinZtZQpyzkDc7wSv7V6FPTwEX3GfjabSZLyWDzJ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 17:10, Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> On 2010-11-17 22:43, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> at the advantage of not confusing new users. We could of course also
>> just drop ident-over-tcp completely, but there might be some poor guy
>> out there who actually *uses* it :-)
>
> As far as I know, companies do use it in their internal networks where they
> do have a reasonable shot at full control over ident connections. I don't
> know how easy it would be for them to switch to other methods.

Yea, I think deleting it is going a bit overboard.

If it was a matter of changing it for those who use ident over tcp, I
really wouldn't hesitate - they're few :-) But the problem is that
it's the ident-over-tcp that's correctly named, not the other one...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-17 17:14:47 Re: unlogged tables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-17 16:52:54 Re: changing MyDatabaseId