Re: GROUPING SETS revisited

2010/8/3 Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:58:03PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:50:00PM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
>> > In case anyone's interested, I've taken the CTE-based grouping sets
>> > patch from [1] and made it apply to 9.1, attached. I haven't yet
>> > done things like checked it for whitespace consistency, style
>> > conformity, or anything else, but (tuits permitting) hope to figure
>> > out how it works and get it closer to commitability in some upcoming
>> > commitfest.
>> >
>> > I mention it here so that if someone else is working on it, we can
>> > avoid duplicated effort, and to see if a CTE-based grouping sets
>> > implementation is really the way we think we want to go.
>> >
>> > [1]
>> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00700.php
>>
>> I've added back one file in the patch enclosed here.  I'm still
>> getting compile fails from
>>
>> CC="ccache gcc" ./configure     --prefix=$PG_PREFIX     --with-pgport=$PGPORT     --with-perl     --with-libxml     --enable-debug     --enable-cassert
>> make
>>
>> Log from that also enclosed.
>>
>
> Yeah, I seem to have done a poor job of producing the patch based on the
> repository I was working from. That said, it seems Pavel's working actively on
> a patch anyway, so perhaps my updating the old one isn't all that worthwhile.
> Pavel, is your code somewhere that we can get to it?
>

not now. please wait a week.

Regards

Pavel

> --
> Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
> End Point Corporation
> http://www.endpoint.com
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkxYeiQACgkQRiRfCGf1UMPlEQCff+I4sCGtR+lzUs6Wb5JKi7Uu
> 3qYAnjLHzHzyMSHHX55QsphkaBbEJ0Zf
> =uRqV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>