| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: security label support, revised |
| Date: | 2010-09-13 12:57:04 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinWA2yTa03i3xRscOxDTF4e1OW91OuXjWGA+rw_@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:38 AM, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> Yes, if and when MAC-X and MAC-Y are installed, it is significant event
> for MAC-X to change X's label, so MAC-X may need to check special
> permissions. But it is a common event for MAC-Y and DAC, so they checks
> an appropriate permission to change one of the properties. Hoever, it
> does not mean we should not give any chance MAC-Y and DAC to check
> something.
>
> I'll revise my patch within a couple of days.
I have a feeling we are talking past each other.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-09-13 13:01:16 | Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-09-13 12:38:02 | Re: security label support, revised |