Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Elections - now open for voting

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgeu-general <pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Elections - now open for voting
Date: 2010-05-10 10:55:11
Message-ID: AANLkTinUINMqutA4FuFiPQ3S5Plgvkdu_7mfNAzOZMaY@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:57, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:33 AM, A. Kretschmer
>>> <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> In response to Thom Brown :
>>>>> Just to clarify, highest ranked vote is 5, lowest is 1.  I automatically
>>>>> selected 1 as my first choice... then bothered to read the actual paragraph at
>>>>> the top.  Luckily I didn't submit it before correcting my selections.
>>>>
>>>> LOL. /me too ;-)
>>>
>>> You know, we considered putting "5 - highest" and "1 -lowest" in the
>>> dropdown box itself, but the general idea was that this was
>>> unnecessarily redundant. Perhaps we were overly naive :-)
>>
>> Yes, by the sound of it, that needs to be fixed ASAP. Perhaps though,
>> 5 - Favourite, 1 - Least Favouite
>
> I'll see if I can find some time for doing that this afternoon or
> evening. Feel free to beat me to it with a patch ;)

Found the time, done it, it's up.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-05-10 13:48:05
Subject: Re: Elections!
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-05-10 10:35:55
Subject: Re: Elections - now open for voting

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group