Re: Stange IO error while working with large objects.

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Stange IO error while working with large objects.
Date: 2011-03-30 13:43:21
Message-ID: AANLkTinTzfQPGgc8f627r+krgZOWxVKFr=kBLNf6MaZr@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hey Merlin,

2011/3/30 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I've checked the disk with badblocs(8). The results are:
> >
> > File /pgsql/9.0/data0/base/16386/11838.5 (inode #3015588, mod time Wed
> Mar
> > 30 13:13:13 2011)
> > has 50 multiply-claimed block(s), shared with 1 file(s):
> > <The bad blocks inode> (inode #1, mod time Wed Mar 30 15:23:19 2011)
> >
> > After this, I've dropped the database and create a new one. Problem is
> > solved.
> > All the same it is interesting, why there was such problem? I am
> disturbed
> > because
> > I intend to use large objects in production...
>
> It's very unlikely the problem is postgres. I give it equal odds on
> hard disk issue (did you check smart?) or lvm bug. I'd consider
> stress testing this storage stack for a while.
>
Thanks for the reply. It seems to me a hardware problem too. I'll check
SMART.

>
> merlin
>

--
// Dmitriy.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2011-03-30 14:40:03 Re: pg_dump problems
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2011-03-30 13:20:29 Re: Stange IO error while working with large objects.