Re: git: uh-oh

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Khee Chin <kheechin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-08-18 15:52:58
Message-ID: AANLkTinRrdQ4cXEsTBpgs69kzdd=ugzH+Sz_Hj7QairB@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:33, Khee Chin <kheechin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I previously proposed off-list an alternate solution to generate the git
> repository which was turned down due to it not being able to handle
> incremental updates. However, since we are now looking at a one-time
> conversion, this method might come in handy.

cvs2git *is* the tool we've been using now that it's a one-off
conversion. It's the one that's causing the current problems.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-08-18 15:56:42 Re: git: uh-oh
Previous Message Michael Haggerty 2010-08-18 15:49:36 Re: git: uh-oh