| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: system views for walsender activity |
| Date: | 2011-01-07 13:09:35 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinOnBeo54bwRKn5KVBkDM3p_L2yDt_LOd1cwOJA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 21:48, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> * pg_stat_replication
>> * pg_stat_standby (not yet)
>
> Just to keep the bikeshedding up, should it in this case not be
> pg_stat_replication_master and pg_stat_replication_standby or such?
> Replication applies to both master and slave...
The reason I didn't use term "master" is that pg_stat_replication is
information of *standby* servers on master server. Of course,
wal senders are processes in the master, but users probably think
they are the location standby servers receives.
I forgot to update SGML for the view. I'll do it soon.
Thanks for the heads-up.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-07 13:16:33 | LOCK for non-tables |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-01-07 12:49:08 | Re: pgsql: New system view pg_stat_replication displays activity of wal sen |