| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement |
| Date: | 2010-06-19 11:34:37 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinMGEAcmow9za6RCEZInW7zbL92TkD2RvW4u99b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:42, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:22 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> > "The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce the release
>> > of version 9.0. "
>> >
>> > Maybe "PostgreSQL 9.0" instead of "version 9.0"?
>>
>> Yeah, tried that too, it seemed repetitive. You don't think so?
>
> O.k. this may not fly but:
>
> The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (that is who we are, not team)
> is proud to announce the release of 9.
Can we please *not* call it 9, but stick to 9.0?
We have enough people talking about PostgreSQL 7 and PostgreSQL 8 not
knowing that 8.0 and 8.4 are quite significantly different products
already. We don't need to encourage *more* of that.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-06-19 15:56:57 | Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-06-19 00:42:24 | Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement |