| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication logging |
| Date: | 2011-01-18 09:56:49 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinK==RkiTuVwYEQyeudhWatZR2Y01+dCOBf2TPM@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> We should treat log_disconnections the same?
>
> We could keep it a boolean, but then only log disconnections for the
> cases that are mentioned in log_connections?
>
> It doesn't make sense to log disconnection for a connection we didn't
> log the connection for...
Maybe true. But, at least for me, it's more intuitive to provide both as
enum parameters.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-18 10:01:55 | Re: REVIEW: Extensions support for pg_dump |
| Previous Message | tv | 2011-01-18 09:53:54 | Re: estimating # of distinct values |