Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT
Date: 2011-01-30 20:09:20
Message-ID: AANLkTinJ0mqkS5sSx8kCm9x+miNeRXdPWaxfVEO8Szjg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for picking this up again and finishing the thing off.  I'll add this
> into my queue of performance tests to run and we can see if this is worth
> applying.  Probably take a little longer than the usual CF review time.  But
> as this doesn't interfere with other code people are working on and is sort
> of a bug fix, I don't think it will be a problem if it takes a little longer
> to get this done.

At least in my book, we need to get this committed in the next two
weeks, or wait for 9.2.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mladen GogalaDate: 2011-01-30 20:11:51
Subject: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-30 19:25:23
Subject: Re: pgbench - tps for Postgresql-9.0.2 is more than tps for Postgresql-8.4.1

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-30 20:17:13
Subject: Re: log_checkpoints and restartpoint
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-30 20:06:01
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group