From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT |
Date: | 2011-02-04 03:28:55 |
Message-ID: | 4D4B7277.80902@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Robert Haas wrote:
> At least in my book, we need to get this committed in the next two
> weeks, or wait for 9.2.
>
Yes, I was just suggesting that I was not going to get started in the
first week or two given the other pgbench related tests I had queued up
already. Those are closing up nicely, and I'll start testing
performance of this change over the weekend.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Mielke | 2011-02-04 03:31:35 | Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? (was: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-02-04 03:17:25 | Re: exposing COPY API |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Mielke | 2011-02-04 03:31:35 | Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? (was: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...) |
Previous Message | Andy Colson | 2011-02-04 03:21:21 | Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements |