From: | Dan Birken <birken(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid? |
Date: | 2011-02-03 06:30:31 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinFaFU=RUtfddYODoV9yHj-TfFc2XL7stg=NZaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thank you everybody for the detailed answers, the help is well appreciated.
A couple of follow-up questions:
- Is the supercap + flash memory considered superior to the BBU in practice?
Is that type of system well tested?
- Is the linux support of the LSI and Adaptec cards comparable?
-Dan
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> example. Scott Marlowe was griping recently about a similar issue in some
> of the LSI models, too. I suspect it's a problem impacting several of the
> larger RAID cards that use the big Intel IOP processors for their RAID
> computations, given that's the part with the heatsink on it.
>
>
> Specifically the LSI 8888 in a case that gave very low amounts of air
> flow over the RAID card. The case right above the card was quite hot,
> and the multilane cable was warm enough to almost burn my fingers whe
>
>
> Interesting...that shoots down my theory. Now that I check, the LSI 8888
> uses their SAS1078 controller, which is based on a PowerPC 440
> processor--it's not one of the Intel IOP processors at all. The 8308 Dan
> has as an option is using the very popular Intel IOP333 instead, which is
> also used in some Areca 1200 series cards (1220/1230/1260).
>
> The Adaptec 5405 and 5805 cards both use the Intel IOP348, as does the
> Areca 1680. Areca puts a fan right on it; Adaptec does not. I suspect
> the only reason the 5805 cards have gotten more reports of overheating than
> the 5405 ones is just because having more drives typically connected
> increases their actual workload. I don't think there's actually any
> difference between the cooling situation between the two otherwise.
>
>
> --
> Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
> PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
> "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-02-03 06:31:05 | Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid? |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-02-03 06:16:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |