| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Александър Шопов <lists(at)kambanaria(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2 |
| Date: | 2010-12-01 11:47:13 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinC0N-qAp2DU_MZb1=Lnms=f+UvVESj6n4OXyYg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 19:49, Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe you are interested about this what I done with JDBC
<snip>
> Driver is here http://www.rsmogura.net/pgsql/pgjdbc_exp_20101130_C.tar.gz is
> currently JDK 6 compatible (will be not), compressed patch takes about 136kb
> gziped.
Is there any particular reason why this work can't be maintained as a
branch to the main driver? My understanding is your work is based off
that one? Being able to work like that would make things a lot easier
to review.
That said, such a process would also be a lot easier if the JDBC
driver wasn't in cvs ;)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kristian Nielsen | 2010-12-01 11:53:02 | Re: We need index-only scans |
| Previous Message | Valentine Gogichashvili | 2010-12-01 11:46:49 | Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lew | 2010-12-01 12:27:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2 |
| Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2010-12-01 11:39:30 | Re: Storing timestamps in text format |