Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-06-01 04:40:56
Message-ID: AANLkTinACNixo1nqbnlWjBNtvCd1TubReBq3CbOLzoEP@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/6/1 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> On May 31, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I was going to propose ==> across the board.
>
>> What about -> ?
>
> hstore already uses that for something else.
>
> Robert's idea isn't a bad one if we're forced to rename the operator.
> I'd still like to know exactly how hard the concrete has set on the
> SQL spec draft, first.  (Peter?)
>

I agree with Tom - we are not hurry. Creating some synonym operator
for hstore like "==>" can be a good idea.

regards
Pavel

>                        regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Krogh 2010-06-01 04:50:45 Re: tsvector pg_stats seems quite a bit off.
Previous Message Giles Lean 2010-06-01 04:35:50 Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows