From: | Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | [Off Topic] Software load balancing question |
Date: | 2010-10-04 23:02:51 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin4jhbVPS6kkEZQhtdgsKPofFuo1UW58Mp0b92S@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi guys, in my typical "ignore the rules when I have an audience of
smart techie people", I thought I'd poll the group about software load
balancing. I know next to nothing about it, but I'm deploying my site
(built on Postgres 9.0 now!) within the next few days and at least
want a simple solution.
I'll be running a load balancer on a cheap, 256MB virtual server
instance running whatever flavor of Linux. I want something super
simple to setup, but perhaps something with more advanced features if
I want to expand. I don't really need sticky sessions, or SSL
support. The site is new and won't have a huge load, I just want to
be "prepared" in case I get flooded unexpectedly.
Am I best off just using Apache with mod_proxy_balancer, or should I
check into solutions such as HAProxy or IPVS? Anything else good out
there that people can recommend?
Another "nice to have" would be a solution where the load balancer
could serve up static resources such as jpg, png, js/css files, and
only forward dynamic page requests to a random web server. However, I
might move those files to a CDN anyway, so not a huge deal. Thanks!!
Sorry for being off-topic, I'll make up for it somehow.
Mike
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ben Madin | 2010-10-04 23:31:06 | Re: Having two simultaneous and similar database |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-10-04 22:39:00 | Re: PG website testing |