Re: warning message in standby

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: warning message in standby
Date: 2010-06-14 15:14:38
Message-ID: AANLkTin4ZYi2HawTzI53uJ0ER3KTR2tVewvqP1MBiUD4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Should I be downgrading Hot Standby breakages to LOG? That will
>> certainly help high availability as well.
>
> If a message is being issued in a non-user-connected session, there
> is basically not a lot of point in WARNING or below.  It should either
> be LOG, or ERROR/FATAL/PANIC (which are probably all about the same
> thing in the startup process...)

I think Simon's point here is the same as mine - LOG isn't too high -
it's too low.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-06-14 15:17:55 Re: GSoC - Materialized Views - is stale or fresh?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-14 15:13:38 Re: Typo in plperl doc ?