From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting |
Date: | 2011-02-10 14:25:28 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin3r23m-JzNp_yszjd8qFrHWLcoM9QwE=cbUg-a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 05:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I did s/failover/promote. Here is the updated patch.
>>
>> I rebased the patch to current git master.
>
> This patch looks fine to me. I will mark it Ready for Committer.
>
> (Someone else please feel free to pick it up for the actual commit, if
> you have cycles.)
I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of
reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that
usecase still remains, no?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-02-10 14:29:43 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove more SGML tabs. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-10 14:25:12 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on building for Windows to accomodate current realit |