| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
| Date: | 2010-12-08 17:00:05 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTin0hDWE_yUgs7onobb2wf7yeQCWoJnpci_P7-oU@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> Have you thought about switching unlogged tables back to logged? Are
> there any significant obstacles?
I think it can be done, and I think it's useful, but I didn't want to
tackle it for version one, because it's not trivial.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-08 17:01:47 | Re: unlogged tables |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-12-08 16:56:43 | Re: serializable read only deferrable |