On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 05:03, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> The fact that the file was "modified" twice after being removed at rev
>>>> 2.88 seems really wacko. Are you sure that's not contributing to what
>>>> we're seeing here?
>>> Yeah, that was discussed in the earlier git-conversion thread that I
>>> pointed to. We never did figure out how that happened, though I
>>> speculated it might have been due to weirdness in Vadim's local
>>> Is it possible to just delete those two revisions from the CVS
>>> repository, and if so would it help? We certainly don't need 'em.
>> cvs admin -o ?
> Magnus, is this something that you can try? Prune those could of
> wonky revisions after the delete and before the re-add prior to
> running the conversion, and see how that comes out?
Do we have list of exactly which revisions it is, or a good way to
find it? Other than random browsing of the history? :-)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-08-31 11:47:34|
|Subject: Re: thousand unrelated data files in pg_default tablespace|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-08-31 11:21:38|
|Subject: Re: Git conversion progress report and call for testing assistance|