| From: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"? |
| Date: | 2011-02-03 14:25:16 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimpX1GGJWW1e17LXxGhqhYKE48kcQc4pEjf+PVz@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
2011/2/3 Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
> in the Acronyms section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
>
> I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
> "Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
>
> I've created a patch, but which should we use?
There was some consensus that "procedural languages" makes sense:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg01485.php
Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-03 16:54:29 | Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-02-03 10:27:16 | Re: Typo in create user mapping docs page |