Re: Streaming Replication: Checkpoint_segment and wal_keep_segments on standby

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication: Checkpoint_segment and wal_keep_segments on standby
Date: 2010-07-16 08:13:53
Message-ID: AANLkTimmKjhmVHUT2NKG9ZanTQ8HyjCJv6CVuAd9LeM_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for reminding me. I attached the updated patch.

This patch left uncommitted for half a month. No one is interested in
the patch?

The patch adds the document about the relationship between a restartpoint
and checkpoint_segments parameter.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-07-16 08:34:25 Re: Always truncate segments before unlink
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-07-16 08:03:34 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure that top level aborts call XLogSetAsyncCommit().