Re: Streaming Replication: Checkpoint_segment and wal_keep_segments on standby

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication: Checkpoint_segment and wal_keep_segments on standby
Date: 2010-07-16 19:22:22
Message-ID: 4C40B16E.8040007@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16/07/10 11:13, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Fujii Masao<masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks for reminding me. I attached the updated patch.
>
> This patch left uncommitted for half a month. No one is interested in
> the patch?

Sorry for the lack of interest ;-)

> The patch adds the document about the relationship between a restartpoint
> and checkpoint_segments parameter.

Thanks, committed with minor editorialization

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2010-07-16 19:38:47 Re: ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2010-07-16 19:16:51 Re: patch: to_string, to_array functions